-
URL Creator -- Pass query without Base64 encoding?
Hey all,
I am trying to integrate DocuWare with a new ERP system, and the new ERP system allows for parameterized URLs to be built and summoned via right-click menu options.
I can get everything working by hard-coding the file cabinet guid, and I can grab query criteria from the context of whatever form I am on in the ERP tool. But the "q" parameter in DocuWare URLs is followed by the query that has been Base-64 encoded. The URL creation area in the ERP tool does not have any functionality with regards to encoding any part of the URL.
Is there a way to pass the "q" parameter "in the clear", that is, without any encoding? Is there a setting on the server that would allow the query string to be passed in the clear? Without this I do not know how I am going to get this working...
Thanks,
Joe Kaufman -
RE: Added Field to File Cabinet -- no one else can see
Tobias,
Thanks for confirming! Much appreciated!
Joe Kaufman
-
RE: Added Field to File Cabinet -- no one else can see
Hey all,
Figured it out -- the file cabinet in question DID have Profiles in play, and apparently when you add a new field you have to explicitly grant the rights to that field per non-default Profile. I made sure the new field got added to our custom Profiles, and it shows up now. The new field automatically gets added to the default Profiles by the looks of it.
Thanks,
Joe Kaufman -
Added Field to File Cabinet -- no one else can see
Hey all,
I added a field (index) to a file cabinet yesterday and added it to all dialogs. Shows up fine for me.
I found out today a different user cannot see the new field. It just isn't there in the store, search, result, or index dialogs.
I have "owner" permissions on the file cabinet but have never seen a certain field be unavailable for some users and not others. WE have not done field-level lockdowns or anything like that, so I do not understand what is going on.
I cleared cache on the other user's workstation and all that -- no difference. What am I missing?
Thanks,
Joe Kaufman -
RE: Migrating PDF's and Data to DocuWare-1516295352
Mark,
One more point of clarification -- my code does NOT create file cabinets. A FileCabinet object in C# is just a programmatic representation of an existing DocuWare file cabinet. I still had to create all the file cabinets by hand, saving off the XML used to create them as I went along (so I could more quickly create them when ready to go live).
My code just takes a document that is saved as a file, loads the dwcontrol file alongside it (as indexes), then uploads the file and applies indexes using the DocuWare API routinesUploadDocument
andEasyUploadSingleDocument
(depending on document size). In fact, my code does not show the part where indexes are generated from the dwcontrol file -- that was a different routine. As long as you can load indexes into a DocuWare Document class (in code), you can use whatever indexing scheme you want.
C# can manipulate the Fortis COM object, too, I just already had the Foxpro code for that. So, you could, if you wanted, use a single C# program that does everything in one flow, one document at at time:
- Find a the document in Fortis you want to migrate.
- Save the document itself as a file to a known location.
- Also save the indexes for the documents in memory (as variables in your program)
- Establish a connection to DocuWare and get a FileCabinet object instanced, representing the destination for the document.
- Upload the document and indexing information to DocuWare, assuming the indexes on the DocuWare cabinet match the indexes on the original DocuWare document.
If any of this helps you, I am glad! Good luck!
Thanks,
Joe Kaufman
-
RE: Canon scanner slowdowns after Windows Feature Update
James,
Thanks for weighing in. We have been installing Fujitsu scanners and things are going great. Good to know someone else is seeing issues with the Kodak scanners -- hope Kodak figures out the issue!
Thanks,
Joe Kaufman -
RE: Migrating PDF's and Data to DocuWare-1516295352
Mark,
To clarify a few things, the methodology I used required pulling all Fortis documents out and placing them in a directory, along with the dwcontrol files containing their indexes. That was one part of this, and it was written in Foxpro against the Fortis COM object. This process also created a Foxpro table with all document information, including file names, Fortis database locations, Fortis document types, and the Fortis document ID.
Once all the documents and their indexes were in the right place (which you would have to do anyway if you wanted to use Import Jobs), the C#/.NET application put them in the right file cabinets with their indexes. All cabinets involved in the migration had three fields in them so I could back-link them to Fortis:
Fortis DB Location
Fortis Document Type
Fortis Document ID
In that sense, the process was self-logging because at any point I could query DocuWare's SQL Server database and see how many documents were migrated. But the C# program also logged progress, in the GUI and with summary results at the end. Since this involved creating my own code, I could do whatever I wanted with regard to logging and progress-reporting.
As for whether or not the code is straightforward, I would say the actual calls to DocuWare were the easier part. More work was put into deciding how to organize the documents and getting the multi-threading working. The calls to DocuWare followed examples already listed in DocuWare online help. Here are examples of the main routines that stored documents to DocuWare and indexed them (same name, UploadFileToFileCabinet, overloaded static methods):
public static Document UploadFileToFileCabinet(FileCabinet fileCabinet, string uploadFile, string[] indexFieldNames, dynamic[] indexValues, bool timestampsAlreadyUTC = false) { Document indexInfo = new Document(); indexInfo.Fields = new List<DocumentIndexField>(); int numIndexFields = Math.Min(indexFieldNames.Length, indexValues.Length); string fieldName = ""; dynamic value = null; Type valueType = null; for (int i = 0; i < numIndexFields; i++) { fieldName = indexFieldNames[i]; value = indexValues[i]; valueType = ((ObjectHandle)value).Unwrap().GetType(); if (valueType.Name.ToUpper() == "STRING") { indexInfo.Fields.Add(DocumentIndexField.Create(fieldName, (string)value)); } else if (valueType.Name.ToUpper() == "INT") { indexInfo.Fields.Add(DocumentIndexField.Create(fieldName, (int)value)); } else if (valueType.Name.ToUpper() == "DECIMAL") { indexInfo.Fields.Add(DocumentIndexField.Create(fieldName, (decimal)value)); } else if (valueType.Name.ToUpper() == "DATETIME") { DateTime timestamp = (DateTime)value; if (!timestampsAlreadyUTC) { // We need to make timestamps UTC (Universal Coordinated Time) for storage in DocuWare, as that is how // all date/time fields are stored in the database. timestamp = timestamp.ToUniversalTime(); } indexInfo.Fields.Add(DocumentIndexField.Create(fieldName, timestamp)); } } return UploadFileToFileCabinet(fileCabinet, uploadFile, indexInfo); } public static Document UploadFileToFileCabinet(FileCabinet fileCabinet, string uploadFile, Document indexInfo = null) { LastError = ""; try { // We will use a standard upload method for smaller files, but the "Easy" version for larger files, otherwise // large file uploads might fail (the "Easy" version is meant for huge file uploads, according to the documentation). int largeFileThresholdInBytes = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10 MB Document uploadedDoc = null; FileInfo fileInfo = new FileInfo(uploadFile); if (fileInfo.Length < largeFileThresholdInBytes) { // Smaller file. uploadedDoc = fileCabinet.UploadDocument(indexInfo, fileInfo); } else { // Larger file. uploadedDoc = fileCabinet.EasyUploadSingleDocument(fileInfo, indexInfo); } return uploadedDoc; } catch (Exception ex) { LastError = ex.Message; return null; } }
You need to have the DocuWare API NuGet packages installed for the above code to truly make sense. And of course these routines require helper routines to do things like get a FileCabinet object by file cabinet name, etc. These routines were a mix of using DocuWare API classes and hitting SQL Server directly to gather various GUIDs and such. I can't really post all that without posting the whole code base.
So, maybe not quite as straightforward as I said. *smile* But it all originated from DocuWare Platform (also known as the "SDK" or "REST API") examples. That documentation can be found here:
https://developer.docuware.com/dotNet_CodeExamples/d25612d7-49fa-4d66-bfcd-67c5591381f7.html
That's how I came up with most of my code base, and it took a while. Some of that was due to writing routines in both Foxpro and C#, though. If you go with C#/.NET for all of it, and don't worry about multi-threading, it should come together more quickly.
Let me know if you have specific questions or if the overall outline of how I did things remains unclear!
Thanks,
Joe Kaufman -
RE: Migrating PDF's and Data to DocuWare-1516295352
Mark,
The import was very fast, mainly because I wrote it as a multi-threaded app that did various document types at the same time (wrote the utility in C#/.NET).
It actually took longer to get all the documents out of Fortis, which I did via Foxpro and the Fortis COM object. That job, too, could be split up just by running code on two or three workstations (old-fashioned multi-threading. *smile*)
I can't really share the multi-threaded nature of the code because that depends on how documents are segmented. But if you need examples of code to upload a document and index it, I can post snippets that might go beyond what is in online documentation.
How much faster than import files? I recall it being a lot faster, even without multi-threading. But, I didn't spend that much time trying to make the import jobs faster. There are various things you can tweak, I just never saw much performance improvement. That's why I decided to roll my own solution and I never looked back. Plus, we still use parts of the application I wrote for ongoing integrations between DocuWare and our custom-developed apps.
Good luck!
Joe Kaufman
-
RE: Canon scanner slowdowns after Windows Feature Update
Shawn,
We discovered that even in the Canon software scans would slow down.
So, we bought a Fujitsu 7160, and it is very speedy and does a nice job. No slowdowns so far for anyone with Feature Update 2004.
Thanks,
Joe Kaufman
-
RE: Setting Document Name view REST api
Not a problem, glad it worked! Interesting scenario, and it is good to know one can force the filename to be the document name in that way!
Thanks,
Joe Kaufman